|
This is a book that initially works on the reader slowly, incrementally.
None of the characters, aside from Trujillo, seems particularly exceptional,
at least at first, and that is partly the point: Vargas Llosa wants
us to see how absolute power infects and saturates a society at every
level, working its poison into even the purest and most well-intentioned
hearts. Yet detail by detail, nuance by nuance, with the tension-building
touch of the smoothest melodramatist everwhy does Urania so hate
her father? and so onhe finally makes you feel breathlessly implicated
in the story. Vargas Llosa is the unequaled master of (unfortunately,
untranslatable) Latin American tough-guy vernacular, and sitting (reading)
as we wait in the car with the young would-be assassinsor, in
other chapters, with Trujillo's thugs and flunkieswe physically
experience the near-homoerotic swagger of bordello and barracks, the
robust pathos of humiliated, defiant manhood.
But it is the novel's marvelous and complex formal masteryits
"totalizing" of a "utopian design"that conquers the reader, in
the way that the formal beauty of great musical composition does. Group
scenes alternate with scenes of tight dramatic confrontation: Urania
with her father; Trujillo with his wiliest and most treacherous political
"allies." Seamlessly, the narrative shifts from past to present and
back. And it opens out into the future, and into the novel's brilliant
set pieces, dramatizing the manner in which the two highest placed and
most secret conspirators in the plot react in the critical hours and
then days following the assassination: The head of the armed forces,
General Román, recognizes what should be done but, as if in the grips
of a tragic and hypnotic dream, leads himself into an inferno by always
doing the opposite; and the austere, dwarflike Balaguer, Trujillo's
loyal puppet, who emerges as the canniest political operator in fiction
since Count Mosca, guides the country toward "democracy" while also
leading the reader with him toward the nihilistic abyss of seemingly
pragmatic and corrupt accommodation. As we follow his manipulations,
we find our own moral judgments so challenged that our stomachs start
to ache.
The novel then glides fatally, inevitably, horribly, back into the
past for the book's climactic scene, which pits a fourteen-year-old
Urania against Trujillo. By then we are saturated by this novel's fictional
realityone so convincing that we feel confused when we recall
that Balaguer was a force in Dominican politics until his death just
a few years ago and not merely a fictional characterand so well
prepared for this scene that we are not particularly surprised or shocked
by what happens. Like a bow against a cello, this revelatory scene plays
against us, plays deep in our inmost selves, and brings something low
and grieving to our lips. I can't think of a novel that better dramatizes
the way political evil can reach any of us in that innermost place.
The Feast of the Goat is a masterpiece of Latin American and
world literature, and one of the finest political novels ever written.
Francisco Goldman is the author of the novels The
Long Night of White Chickens (1992) and The Ordinary Seaman
(1997), both published by Atlantic Monthly Press.
|