|
The book confirms white America's simultaneous impulses toward social
work and concentration camps as answers to all questions of race; it
offers its black heroine uplift and its white readers the certainty
that no matter how far the great mass of black Americans might lift
themselves up, it will never be to their level. As the book hits the
best-seller lists, as huge sums roll in for the paperback rights, then
the movie rights, it burns in Ellison's mind. He's read this before.
He's read it all his life. This is the opposite of Ralph Ellison's Invisible
Man never holding still for the reader; this is what the critic
Albert Murray, writing in 1965 about Claude Brown's Manchild in the
Promised Landembraced by the literati as proof that while
one young black man might have escaped from Harlem, almost everyone
else would have to remain therecalled social science fiction.
To drive out the horror of his sister's death, the fatigue that falls
on him every time he tries to guide his mother through her days, the
sorrow that escapes the smugness with which he has always regarded his
brother, in a fit of cool, measured rage Ellison offers an answer book
to the one all America is reading. "When I was twelve I went to visit
some relatives in Harlem for a couple of days and that's what the novel
comes from," Juanita Mae Jenkins tells Erasure's Oprah about
We's Lives In Da Ghetto. Ellison may never have been to Harlem,
or for that matter Comptonbut if this is authenticity, who needs
it? Any Toni Morrison, Alice Walker, or Zelda Lockhart can pony up the
rape/incest/prostitution/black-woman-enslaved-by-the-black-man trope;
let's hear it for the guy who has to do all the work! In what seems
like a trance
I sat and stared at Juanita Mae Jenkins' face
on Time magazine. The pain started in my feet and coursed through
my legs, up my spine and into my brain and I remembered passages of
Native Son and The Color Purple and Amos and Andy
and my hands began to shake, the world opening around me, tree roots
trembling on the ground outside, people in the street shouting dint,
ax, fo, screet and fahvre! and I was screaming
inside, complaining that I didn't sound like that, that my mother
didn't sound like that, that my father didn't sound like that and
I imagined myself sitting on a park bench counting the knives in my
switchblade collection and a man came up to me and asked me what I
was doing and my mouth opened and I couldn't help what came out, "Why
fo you be axin?"
he writes a novel in the voice of Van Go Jenkins, a nineteen-year-old
black man in California with four babies by four women. The babies are
Aspireene, Tylenola, Dexatrina, and Rexall. The chapters are "Won,"
"Too," "Free," "Fo," "Fibe," "Sex," "Seben," "Ate," "Nine," and "Tin."
The title is My Pafology. The author is "Stagg R. Leigh."
What transpires is a wonderful, hideous jokebut no matter how
hard Thelonious Ellison tries, My Pafology, included in full
in Erasure, is not a joke. Ellison can disrespect anyone who
might read an idiot satire like My Pafology as real life, who
might believe in spellings like Aspireene and Fibe, who can't tell Stagg
R. Leigh from Stagger Lee, but he cannot disrespect words. The novel
is stupid and ridiculousbut no more so than Bret Easton Ellis's
American Psycho and just as carefully made. It is relentlessly
stereotypedbut no more so than Richard Price's Clockers.
It is absolutely self-referential, its world reduced to the size of
a paper cupbut no more so than David Sedaris's Me Talk Pretty
One Day. In other words, you, like Ellison, enter the novel with
a feeling of relief, leaving his dead sister, his broken brother, his
ruined mother, for another day, and like Ellison you rush right through
it.
Ellison gets inside the stuffed doll of Juanita Mae Jenkins's book
and of all the books like it and pulls the doll inside out. What he
hasn't bargained for, though, is what his book will do to him. "The
work inhabited no space artistically that I could find intelligible,"
he saysbut the world has no such problem. It finds Stagg R. Leigh,
whom Ellison presents as an ex-con unwilling to speak to anyone, perfectly
intelligible. A reiteration of the obvious is never wasted on the oblivious:
As an experimental novelist, Ellison has never made sense, but as My
Pafology turns into a property, as it becomes clear that society
will pay anything to hear the story it tells, Ellison ceases to exist.
We's Lives In Da Ghetto, it turns out, was more than a dishonest,
exploitative, self-congratulatory piece of shit; it was the tar baby.
Here Erasure becomes a great yarna tall tale worthy of
Mark Twain. The American joke, Twain wrote in "How to Tell a Story,"
"is told gravely; the teller does his best to conceal that he even dimly
suspects that there is anything funny about it." But the mystery at
the heart of the novel is the phony novel inside itnot because
of how it illuminates the condition of the African American in the United
States at this time, but because of how it illuminates a fictional character
named Thelonious Ellison. Can his story really end where Everett leaves
it, with Ellison stepping onto a stage to assume a new, fictional identityor
to force his country to acknowledge the person it has always refused
to believe is real?
Greil Marcus is a contributing editor of Artforum
and the author of The Manchurian Candidate (British Film Institute/University
of California Press, 2002). |